---

One of the greatest honors for a law firm is to be asked by major bar associations to represent those organizations in cases which present important public policy issues. The partners at Bendit Weinstock have been often asked to undertake this duty, and our amicus cases are listed below.

Please feel free to contact one of the members of our malpractice litigation practice if you have ay questions, or if we may be of asstance in any way.

AMICUS REPRESENTATION:

Counsel for the New Jersey Association for Justice in Khan v. Singh, 200 N. J. 82 N.J. (2009).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, in Cohen v. Cuomo, A-1964-07T3 (App. Div. 2009).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, in Gonzales v. Silver, 407 N. J. Super. 576 (App. Div. 2009).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, in Ferreira v. Rancocos Orthopedic Group, 178 N.J. 144 (2003).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, Palanque v. Lambert-Woolley, 168 N.J. 398 (2001).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, in Hubbard v. Reed, 168 N.J. 387 (2001).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, in Burns v. Belafsky, 166 N.J. 466 (2001).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amicus Curiae, in Gallagher v. Burdette-Tomlin Memorial Hospital, 163 N.J. 38 (2000).

Counsel for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., as Amici Curiae, in Lowe v. Zarghami, 158 N.J. 606 (1999).

Counsel for the New Jersey State Bar Association, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America-N.J., and the Trial Attorneys of New Jersey, as Amici Curiae, in Cornblatt v. Barow, 153 N.J. 218 (1998).

Counsel for the New Jersey State Bar Association, as Amicus Curiae, in In Re Hall, 147 N.J. 379 (1997).